Despite all the benefits that capitalism has brought to society, we have reached the moment when its downsides – social and environmental – have begun to outweigh its positive effects.
Attempts to eliminate the negative social effects of business started as far back as the 1800s. Nevertheless, the dominant corporate attitude has always been the pursuit of financial value, either unconstrained – leaving social concerns to philanthropy – or, more recently, constrained by the simultaneous pursuit of the social value, through such approaches as corporate social responsibility (CSR), bottom-of-the-pyramid ventures or even movements like B-corporations or ‘conscious capitalism’.
These approaches do create certain social value, but this creation is constrained by the pursuit of profit. In sum, creating social value is considered OK as long as it does not harm your bottom line.
So why has a large Japanese pharmaceutical company, Eisai, delivered 2.2 billion tablets of its drug against elephantiasis, a painful and profoundly disfiguring disease threatening 886 million people in 52 countries, to the World Health Organization for free? Why has LSDH, a leading French milk and juice packer, created a little lodge next to its main entrance to provide shelter and showers to outside drivers while they are waiting for long hours for their trucks to be loaded? Why does the FruitGuys, an American fruit-delivery company, agree to buy all of its supplier’s pears, even when they do not reach quality standards, because of an accident in his orchard?
Pursuit of social value
These practices may seem bizarre – indeed, altruistic – for capitalistic businesses, but there’s more. First, these, and other companies we have studied don’t limit their altruism to one or few actions of that kind per year. They do it all the time. In fact, they strive to transform all their business activities to create social value. Second, by unconditionally pursuing social value as best as they can possibly do it, they outperform their traditional competitors who are only focused on financial results.
The explanation of this apparent paradox is provided by the obliquity principle, coined by the British economist John Kay. Indeed, many individuals and organizations enjoy positive outcomes such as happiness, fame or wealth by not pursuing them. Instead, they obtain them in an oblique way by pursuing something else, like mastering a craft to perfection. The altruistic corporations do just that: they focus unconditionally on social value creation and, as a consequence, succeed economically.
Hence, Handelsbanken, a leading Swedish bank, thinks of its bank advisers as family doctors taking care of their customers’ (financial) health and more. These customers probably don’t have the cell phone numbers of their doctors, yet they have the ones of their bank advisers and can use them even during the weekend. And just like doctors’ first oath is “do no harm”, so Handelsbanken’s advisers will not practise cross-selling or promote in-house products if they are not the best on the market nor suitable for that particular client. And similar to doctors, the bank is not advertising its services.
By doing all that and more for 47 years now, Handelsbanken has outperformed its competition in profitability every single year. Moreover, according to a study based on data collected by London Business School on the share value of tens of thousands of listed companies since 1900, Handelsbanken’s share value was multiplied by 1.9 million: the world’s highest over this period. When we asked a bank’s executive to comment on these outstanding results, he just said that they are “simply the consequence of our culture and our value-based organizational system focusing on the customer”.
Or the aforementioned Eisai – a publicy traded company – which doesn’t think its purpose consists of manufacturing and selling of drugs in order to maximize profits. Instead, Eisai conceives its purpose as relieving the suffering of patients and their families. Eisai not only thinks differently from other pharmaceutical companies but acts differently too: it asked its shareholder assembly to vote on the replacement of profit-maximization by this social purpose in the corporate bylaws, and 75% voted yes.
It has also transformed itself so that each of its business activities pursues this social purpose and not the economic one. Paradoxically – or rather, naturally – this has led to outstanding economic performance too; the company grew organically from being in the world’s 30 largest pharmaceutical companies to being now among the world’s 20 largest. We say naturally because Eisai’s bylaws state that if the company does its best to pursue its social purpose, it will prosper. And it does.
Have you read?
Handelsbanken and Eisai are not alone. Through a five-year research project we have identified several dozen companies that are redefining the whole concept of the capitalistic firm. We have called them the altruistic corporation. In one sentence, it’s a company in which most activities serve its outside counterparts unconditionally and which – thanks to this radical orientation – thrives economically. Be it customers, suppliers, the local community, the older generation who developed its know-how, the local youth, or its shareholders – the altruistic corporation organizes its business activities in order to serve them unconditionally.
In other words, the altruistic corporation has the pursuit of social value at the heart of its business, and not as a side programme or one simultaneous to its pursuit of economic value.
There’s an old saying: “Take care of your customers, and the customers will take care of your business.” With the dozens of companies we have studied, we can say: “Take care of others – the counterparts of your company – and they will take care of your business.” True, a leap of faith is needed for a business leader to choose such a business philosophy. But as the French poet and politician, Victor Hugo, said: “Utopia is tomorrow’s reality.”